UK Cellular: The Context

The UK is a high-penetration market (134%), and has for the most part been considered a high-competition one, with 5 MNOs and numerous resellers/MVNOs. However, since the Free.fr and T-Mobile USA price disruptions, the UK has ceased to be one of the cheaper markets among rich countries and now seems a little expensive by French standards, while the EE joint venture effectively means a move down from 5 operators to 4. There has been considerable concern that a price disruption was in the offing since BT acquired 2.6GHz spectrum, perhaps via a “Free-style” BT deployment, or alternatively via BT leasing the spectrum to a third party, possibly Virgin Media or TalkTalk. However, it is not as obvious that there is a big target for price disruption as it was in France pre-Free or the US pre-T-Mobile, as Figure 1 shows. The UK operators are only slightly dearer than the French average, with one exception, and the market is more competitive.

Figure 1: The UK is a slightly dearer cellular market than France

Source: STL Partners, themobileworld.com

The following chart summarises the current status of the operators.

Figure 2: UK mobile market overview, 2012-2014

Source: Company Accounts, STL Partners analysis

One reason to pick EE over O2 is immediately clear – EE has substantially better ARPU, is increasing it, and is at least holding onto customers. A deeper look into the company shows that the 4G network is just recruiting customers fast enough to compensate for churn away from the two legacy networks. Overall, the market is just growing.

Figure 3: UK cellular subscriber growth, 2012-2014

Source: Company Accounts, STL Partners analysis

O2 is the cheapest of the four 4G operators and is discounting hard to win share. Meanwhile, Vodafone UK starts to look like a squeezed third operator, losing customers and ARPU at the same time, and fourth operator 3UK looks remarkably strong. In terms of profitability, Figure 4 shows that Vodafone is just managing to hold its margins, while O2 is growing at constant margins, EE is improving its margins, and 3UK is powering ahead, improving its margins, ARPU, and subscriber base at the same time.

Figure 4: 3UK is a remarkably strong fourth operator

 

Source: Company Accounts, STL Partners analysis

To access the rest of this Report in full, including...

• UK Cellular: The Context
• Meanwhile, in the Retail ISP Market
• The Business Case for BT+EE
• An affordable deal?
• Valuation and leverage
• Synergy: operational cost savings
• Synergy: marketing, customer data and cross-sales
• Synergy: quad-play revenue
• Can a BT-EE merger be acceptable to the Regulator?
• The Spectrum Position
• The Vertical Integration Problem
• The Move towards Convergence and the Fixed Squeeze Potential Scenarios
• Conclusion: big bets, tests, and signals
• BT: betting big
• The market: three big decisions
• The regulator and the regulatory environment: a big test
• Sending important signals

…and the following figures…

• Figure 1: The UK is a slightly dearer cellular market than France
• Figure 2: UK mobile market overview, 2012-2014
• Figure 3: UK cellular subscriber growth, 2012-2014
• Figure 4: 3UK is a remarkably strong fourth operator
• Figure 5: UK consumer wireline overview
• Figure 6: FTTC is mostly benefiting the “major independent” ISPs
• Figure 7: BT Sport has peaked as a driver of broadband net-adds, but the football rights bills keep coming
• Figure 8: Content costs are eating around 70% of wholesale fibre revenue at BT
• Figure 9: BT Sport’s impact on its market valuation
• Figure 10: BT-EE would blow through the 2013 regulatory cap on spectrum allocations, but not the proposed cap post-2.3/3.4GHz auctions
• Figure 11: Although BT-EE is just compliant with the 2.3/3.4GHz cap, it looks suspiciously dominant
• Figure 12: Fibre-rich MNOs break away from the herd of mediocrity in Europe Figure 13: Vodafone – light on fibre across the EU